WANA (Jun 10) – Rafael Grossi, Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), once again leveled a baseless accusation against the Islamic Republic of Iran during his recent press conference, claiming that he possesses “compelling evidence” that “highly confidential IAEA documents” have fallen into Iran’s hands.

 

This allegation comes despite the Islamic Republic’s previous strong denial of such claims, describing them as “unfounded and politically motivated.” Iranian officials have consistently stressed that the IAEA, instead of maintaining a technical and impartial approach, has succumbed to political pressure from certain states, thereby politicizing what should be purely technical matters.

 

In his latest remarks, Grossi offered no verifiable public evidence, stating instead: “Unfortunately, this dates back several years… We were clearly able to determine that documents belonging to the Agency had come into the possession of Iranian officials.” He also claimed that this issue could “undermine mutual trust” and negatively impact the IAEA’s inspection process in Iran.

 

In a recent statement addressed to the IAEA Board of Governors, Grossi asserted: “As long as Iran does not cooperate to resolve the remaining safeguards issues, the Agency will not be able to provide assurance that Iran’s nuclear program is exclusively peaceful.”

Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Rafael Grossi, attended an exhibition showcasing Iran’s latest achievements in nuclear technology at the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran (AEOI) on April 17, 2025. Social media/ WANA News Agency

In response, Iranian officials have described Grossi’s report as “unfair and lacking professional integrity,” emphasizing that Iran has consistently cooperated with the IAEA within the framework of its safeguards agreements and in line with its international obligations.

 

According to independent analysts, such claims by the IAEA—particularly at a time when nuclear negotiations have reached a sensitive juncture—appear to reflect political pressure exerted by certain governments rather than genuine technical concerns.

 

Some observers argue that Grossi’s statement is aimed at shifting attention from Iran’s apparent intelligence success in obtaining sensitive Israeli regime documents.

 

Well-informed sources have revealed that Iran recently obtained classified documents indicating full coordination between the IAEA and the Israeli regime. These documents were reportedly uncovered in a recent operation conducted by Iran’s Ministry of Intelligence.

 

A review of the retrieved materials suggests that Iran’s confidential and sensitive correspondence with the IAEA had been leaked via covert channels to Israeli intelligence services.

 

 

A knowledgeable source stated: “These documents clearly show that the IAEA, instead of acting as a neutral agency, has been turned into a tool serving the goals of the Zionist regime.”

 

In an interview with the Israeli newspaper Jerusalem Post, Grossi also remarked that destroying Iran’s nuclear facilities would require enormous military force, while confirming that talks between Washington and Tehran are still ongoing.

 

Grossi warned: “Such an attack could have a unifying effect for Tehran and, I say this explicitly, it could strengthen Iran’s resolve to pursue and resume nuclear weapons development—or even to withdraw from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).” “I tell you this,” he added, “because they [Iran’s political and military leadership] have told me so directly.”

 

Iran has previously warned that continued politicization of the Agency’s activities could jeopardize technical cooperation and damage mutual trust.

 

The Islamic Republic has reaffirmed that, while adhering to its legal commitments, it will not allow biased reporting to become a tool for exerting political pressure against the country.