WANA (Aug 13) – Imagine that right during the days when the sounds of fighter jets and explosions echo through cities and war news dominates media headlines, thousands of couples line up to hold their wedding ceremonies!

 

This is not an imaginary picture; statistics show that during the 12 days of war and military tensions by the U.S. and Israel against Iran in June 2025, over 21,000 marriages were registered in Iran—a 20.9% increase compared to the completely calm days of the previous year.

 

But the story does not end there; a few months later, during the subsequent war that broke out against Iran on February 28, 2026, everything suddenly reversed, and marriage rates plummeted by over 51%.

 

So why did a society that was rushing to form families under a hail of fire suddenly suffer an unprecedented shock and freeze shortly afterward during the second war?

 

The Secret of the First Wave: Seeking Refuge in Security Amid Insecurity

Crisis psychology offers an interesting explanation for the unexpected surge in marriages in June 2025: “initial shock.” When society faces a sudden, short-term threat, the human instinct for survival awakens. Under these conditions, people feel the external world is unsafe, and their only anchor becomes emotional relationships and the family structure.

 

Many young men and women who were in the final stages of engagement or decision-making expedited official registration out of fear that “tomorrow might be too late” or that conditions might grow more complex. In fact, the 12-day war acted not as an obstacle, but as an accelerator for postponed decisions.

 

 

Why Was the Second War Different?

However, in February 2026 and March–April 2026, the tables turned completely. The 51.6% drop in marriages in February and the continuing 6.5% decline even during the ceasefire period (with 51,474 registered cases compared to 55,024 cases the previous year) showed that the nature of the second crisis was fundamentally different.

 

When a crisis transforms from a “fleeting shock” into an “attritional, uncertain process,” it alters the collective behavior of the populace. Constant stress, loss of hope for tomorrow, and a sense of limbo leave no energy to start a new life. Society no longer seeks refuge in insecurity; instead, it retreats into a defensive shell and treads with extreme caution.

 

From Psychological Shock to Behavioral Paralysis

In sociology, human behavior in response to environmental threats does not follow a fixed pattern. During an initial confrontation, humans react through the “fight or flight” mechanism; turning to traditions, strengthening family bonds, and accelerating the creation of a warm home environment are tools to “fight” against feelings of mortality and sudden danger.

 

But in a second confrontation, when the threat shifts from an instantaneous event to a sustained state of uncertainty, society’s psyche and body undergo a form of “behavioral freeze and paralysis.”In this phase, the horizon of events appears so dark and unpredictable that making any vital life decision seems like a luxurious, irrational risk.

 

 

The Gordian Knot of the Economy

Marriage is not merely an emotional decision; it is a full-fledged economic equation. In the second wave of the crisis, what weighed heaviest on families’ shoulders—even more than the conflict itself—was an unprecedented surge in liquidity, inflationary expectations, and severe instability in housing and livelihood markets.

 

When the initial costs of starting a life multiply within a few weeks and no clear horizon for financial stability exists, even the most determined individuals hold back. The collapse in marriage numbers during the ceasefire proved that fear of an “economic non-future” acts far more destructively than fear of “war itself.”

 

The Deviation in Three Provinces That Did Not Join the Trend

An interesting point in this analysis is the distinct behavior of three provinces—Tehran, Kurdistan, and Sistan and Baluchestan—which experienced a decline or stagnation in marriages even during the upward trend of the first wave.

 

Tehran, as the commercial hub and economic artery, immediately absorbed negative inflation signals and reacted cautiously. In Kurdistan and Sistan and Baluchestan, regional variables and specific local livelihood structures prevented local communities from making emotional decisions during the initial shock.

1,000 Couples Tie the Knot in Tehran Mass Wedding Campaign

Long-Term Consequences: The Threat of “Structural Delay”

The freeze in marriages during the second crisis is not merely a number in official statistics; it is a variable whose effects will reverberate through the sub-layers of society for years to come. When the period of “suspension and waiting” drags on, temporary behaviors turn into permanent norms.

 

This collapse in numbers accelerates the population aging process, further reduces fertility rates, and, by accumulating the suppressed demands of the youth, will create deep social frustration.

 

The contradictory behavior of the public across these two periods conveys a clear message: humans can draw closer together and build a safe haven in response to sudden shocks, but under prolonged uncertainty and crushing economic pressures, they lose the capacity to plan.

 

The sharp drop in marriage statistics in the second phase is a social warning; society has entered a state of “standby,” and as long as stability, psychological security, and economic predictability do not return, this freeze will continue.