Military Conflict with Iran Could Eclipse the Vietnam War
WANA (Feb 26) – Dr. Ramin Kamran, an Iranian scholar affiliated with Sorbonne University, has issued a stark warning regarding the prospect of U.S. military action against Iran, arguing that such a scenario could result in consequences far more severe for Washington than those experienced during the Vietnam War.
In remarks that have drawn attention in Persian-language media, Kamran questioned the strategic endgame of a potential strike on Iran. “What happens the day after?” he asked, suggesting that even if initial attacks were to inflict damage, Tehran’s retaliatory capabilities could rapidly shift the balance and impose unpredictable costs on the United States.
The researcher contended that military escalation would neither halt Iran’s strategic ambitions nor secure political concessions. Instead, he argued, it risks widening instability across an already volatile region. According to Kamran, the notion that sustained bombing or military pressure could force Iran into submission reflects “a fundamental misreading of Iran’s social and strategic realities.”
The Fear Rooted in Iran’s Power
WANA (Feb 23) – In recent months, the prospect of war with Iran has turned into a wide-ranging political, media, and strategic debate in the United States and Israel, encompassing governments, elites, and public opinion alike. Within this context, the recent meeting in Washington between Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu ended without a clear […]
Kamran also commented on U.S. President Donald Trump, describing him as a leader who oscillates between projecting toughness and avoiding the financial and human toll of a large-scale war. He suggested that Washington remains wary of the economic burden and long-term entanglement that a ground conflict with Iran would entail.
Referring to statements by Iran’s Supreme Leader, Seyed Ali Khamenei, Kamran characterized Tehran’s position as firm and deterrence-driven. He said the message from Iranian leadership is clear: any attack would be met with a “heavy and decisive” response, a stance intended to prevent strategic miscalculation.
In conclusion, Kamran warned that a direct military confrontation between the two countries could spiral beyond manageable limits, potentially reshaping not only Middle Eastern security dynamics but also broader international stability.
