WANA (Jun 24) – While international media outlets speak of a “ceasefire” between Iran and Israel, a closer look at developments on the ground and in diplomatic circles suggests that what has occurred is not a lasting peace, but rather the outcome of the other side’s desperation and retreat. A thorough analysis of the dimensions of this ceasefire reveals that Iran has not relinquished its initiative—in fact, Tehran remains in a dominant and offensive position.

 

1. Ceasefire Initiated by the Enemy

According to field reports and sources close to Iranian decision-makers, the process of initiating a ceasefire was proposed by Israel and the United States. This request primarily reflects the deep pressures and battlefield setbacks they have faced. The unprecedented circumstances pushed them to seek de-escalation through diplomatic means.

 

2. Iran’s Condition for Delivering a Final Blow

Contrary to public perception that the ceasefire was sudden or the result of mutual agreement, Iran conditionally accepted the ceasefire—on the premise that it would first deliver a decisive and extensive blow to Israel’s critical positions. The enemy’s acceptance of this condition is a clear sign of their strategic weakness and operational deadlock.

 

3. Iran’s Pre-Dawn Strikes

The massive strikes launched early this morning, reportedly targeting sensitive and strategic Israeli positions, were part of that final blow Iran executed before the ceasefire took effect. Informed sources have described the strikes as “decisive and effective,” saying they not only disrupted the psychological balance on the battlefield but also forced Israel into a defensive posture.

 

4. Neither Peace Nor Agreement: A Temporary Pause

It is important to note that what is currently being referred to as a “ceasefire” does not reflect peace or even a comprehensive agreement. Rather, it is a temporary pause—an opportunity to assess the situation, address weaknesses, and reorganize forces. Iran sees this pause not as a retreat, but as a moment to recalibrate and prepare for the next phase.

 

5. A Fragile Ceasefire, with a Rapid Response at the Ready

The current situation is anything but stable. The ceasefire is extremely fragile, and any provocative action by Israel will be met with an immediate, firm, and unannounced response from Iran. In reality, by maintaining full readiness, Tehran has made it clear that the current halt is not the end of confrontation, but rather a calculated component of an active and strategic plan.