Trump and the Recurring Pattern of Disinformation
WANA (Apr 22) – Last night, U.S. President Donald Trump completely changed his position on the ceasefire with Iran in less than seven hours. He first declared: “The ceasefire will not be extended under any circumstances,” but just hours later, in a new message, he announced: “The ceasefire has been extended”—a sudden reversal that once again drew attention to his ongoing pattern of contradictory statements and narrative-building behavior.
Trump claimed that the decision to extend the ceasefire was made in response to requests from Pakistani officials and aimed at giving Iran time to present a “coherent proposal.” He stated: “The ceasefire will remain in place until Iran submits its proposal and discussions reach a conclusion in any form.”
This claim comes despite reports indicating that no active negotiation process is currently underway, and that Iran had already decided not to participate in the planned talks in Islamabad.
At the same time, U.S. media outlets have amplified this narrative with a wave of unverified reports about diplomatic movements. One of the most repeated claims has been that Vice President J.D. Vance is heading to Pakistan—an assertion that has been made multiple times but has never materialized.
U.S. media reported: “This is the fifth time it has been claimed that J.D. Vance is on his way to Pakistan, yet he has never arrived.”
According to alleged White House sources: “Roughly every six hours, reports say Vance is en route to Pakistan, but none of these trips have actually taken place.”
If such narratives were taken at face value, several rounds of negotiations would already have been completed by now. In reality, however, no such talks have taken place, and Iran’s position of not participating remains unchanged.
Trump Extends Ceasefire After Iran Declines to Enter Talks
WANA (Apr 21) – Following Iran’s decision not to engage in negotiations, Donald Trump, the President of the United States, announced an extension of the ceasefire—a move he said was made in response to a request from Pakistani officials. Trump stated that the decision came after appeals from Pakistan’s army chief, Asim Munir, and […]
Alongside these claims, Western media has also consistently promoted the narrative of “internal divisions in Iran,” despite providing no verifiable evidence. Official positions in Iran, however, indicate a notable level of cohesion among the government, parliament, and military institutions in response to U.S. pressure.
On the military front, a clear gap is also visible between official U.S. claims and reported facts on the ground. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt stated: “We destroyed 13,000 targets in Iran and did not target any civilians.”
However, documented reports present a different picture: “The Shajareh al-Tayyebeh school in Minab was struck by two Tomahawk missiles, killing 156 students and teachers.”
Iranian official medical reports also state: “Among the victims are 7 infants under one year old, 255 children aged 1 to 12, and 121 teenagers aged 13 to 18.” In addition, official data reports: “44,750 residential units have been damaged in Tehran alone.”
Pictures of child victims killed in strikes are displayed at Tajrish Bazaar, ahead of Nowruz, the Iranian New Year, amid the U.S.-Israeli conflict with Iran, in Tehran, Iran, March 19, 2026. Majid Asgaripour/WANA (West Asia News Agency)
Criticism of this pattern is not limited to external observers. The Washington Post reported: “Trump made more than 30,000 false or misleading claims during his first four years in office.”
Political commentator Cenk Uygur said: “Trump extended the negotiation deadline because there were no negotiations in the first place—Iranians did not show up, and Vance did not go.”
Writer Don Winslow also stated: “Trump’s latest statement is just another lie; he refuses to admit his complete failure.”
Taken together, these developments suggest not isolated inconsistencies, but a broader and repeated pattern: the continuous production of contradictory narratives, rapid policy shifts, reliance on unverified sources, and media-driven perception management.
Within this context, Iran’s repeated emphasis on the “unreliability of the United States” reflects a broader strategic assessment rather than a rhetorical position. Past withdrawals from agreements, constantly shifting demands, and now repeated contradictions between statements and actions have reinforced the perception that the core issue is not merely political disagreement—but the absence of a trustworthy negotiating counterpart.
In other words, when major policy decisions are reversed within hours, negotiations are repeatedly announced without substance, and on-the-ground realities are contradicted by official statements, the question of trust becomes structural rather than incidental—posing one of the main obstacles to any future diplomatic engagement.
Shooting at the Iran Deal: Will the U.S. Repeat the Mistake?
WANA (Apr 19) – “Iran decided to fire bullets yesterday in the Strait of Hormuz – A Total Violation of our Ceasefire Agreement! … We’re offering a very fair and reasonable DEAL, and I hope they take it because, if they don’t, the United States is going to knock out every single Power Plant, and […]
