WANA (May 05) – Just about 20 days after an undeclared ceasefire took hold, explosions have once again echoed across the Persian Gulf. This time, the United Arab Emirates has been targeted—attacks that many interpret as a direct message from Iran in the midst of a low-intensity, semi-covert conflict.

 

Reports from the UAE indicate a series of coordinated incidents across the country: from a missile strike targeting Dubai’s port to a fire in Fujairah and disruptions to flight operations.

 

At the same time, there are reports of maritime incidents and fires aboard several vessels near the Emirati coast. Authorities have confirmed the activation of air defense systems and a state of heightened alert.

 

 

In the regional media space, these attacks have been widely attributed to Iran—although no clear or official confirmation has yet been released.

 

These developments come against the backdrop of a broader confrontation: Since February 28, a conflict involving the United States, Israel, and Iran has been underway. This imposed war on Iran lasted around 40 days, and for roughly the past 20 days, the parties have entered an undeclared ceasefire. However:

 

  • No official end to the war has been announced
  • The situation remains in a “neither war nor peace” state
  • And at any moment, a return to open conflict remains possible

 

But what message do the recent attacks on the UAE carry?

 

1. A shift toward preemptive action by Iran

Some analysts believe Iran may have altered its approach, launching a preemptive strike—something it had not done previously. In this view, the attacks represent limited, targeted actions rather than the آغاز of a full-scale war. Still, there is no definitive information, and the exact scenario remains unclear for now.

 

2. Drawing a red line over disputed islands

One key interpretation centers on Iran’s islands in the Persian Gulf. There are suggestions that threats—or even plans—regarding these islands may have emerged. The attacks, in this context, serve as a warning to the UAE as a potential backer of such a scenario.

 

This would explain why the nature of the strikes appears more like signaling than escalation—aimed at sending a message, not triggering an all-out war.

A woman walks past a billboard with a graphic design about the Strait of Hormuz on a building, amid a ceasefire between U.S. and Iran, in Tehran, Iran, April 27, 2026. Majid Asgaripour/WANA (West Asia News Agency)

3. Tied to the U.S. plan in the Strait of Hormuz

Another significant angle relates to a new U.S. initiative, which Donald Trump has referred to as the “Freedom Project.”

 

According to his statements, the U.S. intends to carry out an operation to ensure safe passage for a large number of ships that have been stranded in the Persian Gulf for weeks—over 60 days—due to rising tensions and restrictions.

 

Trump has described the move as “humanitarian,” while also warning that any interference would be met with a strong response.

 

At the same time, he has claimed that negotiations with Iran are “positive”—a dual message combining threat and reassurance.

 

If the UAE has played a role in supporting or facilitating this plan, it may explain why it has become a target. Some analysts therefore see the attacks as an attempt to influence—or disrupt—the Strait of Hormuz initiative.

 

4. A response to economic pressure

There is also an economic dimension to consider. Pressure on the UAE could be a response to its role in restricting Iranian assets.

 

According to this view, the UAE has cooperated financially with the United States in ways that have impacted Iran’s currency market. The current developments may signal that Iran is shifting from economic response to field-level action.

 

The attacks on the UAE must be viewed within a broader picture:

  • A war that hasn’t truly ended
  • A fragile ceasefire
  • And actors simultaneously sending signals while avoiding direct confrontation

 

At present, the situation sits at a critical juncture—neither full peace nor full war. And precisely because of that, the balance  could shift at any moment.