WANA (Feb 06) – Donald Trump, whose withdrawal from the JCPOA marked the beginning of the maximum pressure policy, is now adopting a different tone regarding Iran. In a meeting with Benjamin Netanyahu, he uncharacteristically described Iran as “strong” but quickly added: “Of course, that doesn’t mean it can’t become weak again.”

 

He also reiterated that the U.S. would never allow Iran to acquire nuclear weapons and, in line with this stance, signed a document to continue exerting pressure on Tehran.

 

However, just hours later, in a conversation with reporters, his tone shifted. When asked whether he was willing to negotiate with the Iranian president, he simply replied: “Yes!”

 

 

Carrot-and-Stick Approach Toward Tehran

During this meeting, Trump signed an official note reinstating maximum pressure on Iran while at the same time expressing his willingness to engage in talks with the Iranian president.

 

This contradiction is a clear example of the classic carrot-and-stick strategy repeatedly used against Iran: threats and pressure on one side and offers of negotiation on the other.

 

But this time, there is a key difference. Trump is no longer the same unilateralist president of 2018 who unhesitatingly abandoned the JCPOA. Now, even in his social media posts, he emphasizes the “need for a peaceful and verifiable agreement.”

 

Some analysts view this slight shift in Trump’s rhetoric as a political tactic. He is well aware that the maximum pressure campaign has not yielded the expected results. Instead of forcing Iran into submission, it has strengthened its resistance economy.

 

Meanwhile, America’s European allies remain concerned about his potential return to the White House, and Trump seems keen to present a softer diplomatic image at this stage.

 

In 2018, Trump withdrew from the JCPOA and imposed harsh sanctions on Iran, expecting swift results. However, rather than weakening Iran, these measures led to a more resilient economy and further advancements in its nuclear program.

 

One of Trump’s senior advisors commented: “Pressure on Iran is essential, but that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t pursue a better deal.”

 

Iran’s Strong Reactions

In Tehran, Trump’s statements sparked immediate responses. Iranian Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi told reporters: “Maximum pressure has been a failed experiment. Iran remains a committed member of the NPT, and our stance on this issue is clear. Additionally, the Supreme Leader’s fatwa has explicitly prohibited nuclear weapons.”

 

Mohammad Eslami, head of Iran’s Atomic Energy Organization, also reacted: “Trump saying Iran should not have nuclear weapons is nothing new. Iran has never pursued, does not pursue, and will never pursue nuclear weapons.”

 

However, the strongest response came from Iran’s First Vice President, who firmly rejected any negotiations with Trump, stating: “Meeting and negotiating with Trump is not on the Islamic Republic’s agenda.”

 

He also pointed out: “If Trump believes Iran should not acquire nuclear weapons, that has always been Iran’s permanent policy. The U.S. president can rest assured—our stance is backed by a religious decree, and there is no debate on this matter.”

 

 

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei emphasized: “Iran has repeatedly demonstrated its readiness for diplomatic engagement. However, it will stand firm against threats and pressure.”

 

Trump’s Dilemma: Pressure or Diplomacy?

In the hours leading up to signing the anti-Iran memo, Trump was seated at his desk, reportedly hesitant about his decision. A senior U.S. official present at the meeting revealed that Trump remarked: “I hope I won’t have to use this memo too often.”

 

Yet, despite his hesitation, he ultimately signed the document and told reporters: “We will not allow Iran to obtain nuclear weapons. Many high-ranking Iranian officials don’t want such weapons either.”

 

 

Beyond Rhetoric: The Need for Concrete Policy Changes

The reality is that returning to negotiations requires more than just a change in tone—it demands a shift in concrete policies. So far, Iran has shown no signs of yielding to new U.S. pressures, while Trump remains committed to his economic and military strategies.

 

What is clear is that Iran has not backed down under maximum pressure, nor has it closed the door on diplomacy. If Trump is truly seeking a new agreement, this time he must go beyond media tactics and adopt a credible and practical policy.

 

During his first presidency, Trump’s maximum pressure campaign resulted in increased uranium enrichment and expanded stockpiles of 20% and 60% enriched uranium in Iran. If he hopes to achieve a different outcome this time, he will need a fundamentally new approach.