WANA (Apr 18) – The undeniable anger of Netanyahu and his harsh opposition to the negotiations raise concerns in Iran that the Israeli lobby might attempt to disrupt the talks. Therefore, the United States must prove its independence from the illegitimate demands and actions of the Israeli regime and Netanyahu, in its dealings with the Islamic Republic.

 

Given the complex dynamics of the international system and the recent U.S. approach that emphasizes military and economic pressure to impose its will, Iran has adopted a different and calculated strategy in response. Unlike the U.S. stance toward other countries—where negotiations were never even considered—with Iran, the U.S. initially proposed talks under the shadow of threats, which Iran firmly rejected. However, after a shift in Washington’s tone, Iran agreed to indirect negotiations to safeguard its national interests and security.

 

Unlike the usual American method of using negotiations as a tool to enforce its demands, Iran has set a precedent by laying down three key conditions for the indirect talks in Oman: first, rejection of negotiations under pressure; second, Iran’s right to choose the venue; and third, Iran’s authority to determine the subject of the talks.

 

America’s acceptance of these conditions is a rare occurrence in recent years and reflects Washington’s urgent need for these negotiations—this urgency can be seen as part of its broader strategy to maintain global hegemony.

 

However, one of the main concerns that could potentially alter or even suspend the negotiation process is the intervention of the Israeli lobby, particularly Netanyahu. His obvious anger and aggressive opposition to the talks create the possibility that this lobby will actively work to sabotage the negotiations. Hence, it is crucial for the United States to demonstrate its independence from the undue influence of the Israeli regime and Netanyahu in its diplomatic dealings with Iran.

 

What stands out in this round of negotiations is Iran’s initiative to consider the concerns and sensitivities of neighboring and regional countries, especially Arab states. Unlike past talks between Iran and the West—which were held in isolation and with little regard for regional perspectives—this time, Iran is working to maintain and even strengthen its relationships with neighboring countries while engaging in negotiations with the U.S. This reflects Iran’s deep understanding of the importance of preserving regional trust.

 

Moreover, Iran has repeatedly emphasized its commitment to enhancing regional security, advocating for a region free of foreign interference. While neighboring countries have yet to take a clear stance on these talks, they appear to be awaiting concrete outcomes and the continuation of the dialogue.

 

At the same time, Iran has maintained and expanded its relations with key global players like Russia, China, and European countries. This has helped preserve diplomatic balance and allowed Iran to utilize diverse capacities to secure its national interests. Such a multilateral strategy has strengthened Iran’s bargaining power and enabled more effective management of both regional and global developments.