The Islamic Republic of Iran and the Do’s and Don’ts of Nuclear Weapons
WANA (Nov 04) – If nuclear power was not a deterrent, Europe, the United States, and Israel would not oppose Iran’s nuclearization.
The theory of dynamic jurisprudence is on par with hermeneutic analysis of phenomena and objective realities, and the theory of balance of power is an accepted and obvious principle in deterrence.
A discursive analysis of Iran’s Supreme Leader’s recent statement—where he emphasized that “in confronting arrogance, we will absolutely do everything necessary to prepare the Iranian nation, including militarily and in terms of armaments”—suggests that the Leader’s message conveys the need to repel evil and hints at equipping the Islamic Republic of Iran with what the enemy possesses.
Ayatollah Khamenei: Decisive Response to Attacks on Iran and Resistance
WANA (Nov 02) – In line with the annual tradition, a group of students from across Iran met with Ayatollah Khamenei, Iran’s Supreme Leader, on the eve of November 4th, which marks Iran’s Student Day and the National Day of Fighting Against Arrogance. During the meeting, the Supreme Leader discussed the fight against global […]
If my analysis holds true, it affirms the theory of dynamic jurisprudence. This theory is tightly bound to the demands of the times.
Rational and religious imperatives point to the self-evident fact that Iran must secure equivalent armaments for defense and deterrence against the malign force known as Zionist Jewry.
From the perspective of political science, building and using a nuclear bomb might be considered as a single concept, but in religious jurisprudence, they can be distinct: “Constructing does not necessarily equate to using; it serves as deterrence.”
Nuclear Arms as Iran’s Last Line of Defense Against Threats
WANA (Nov 02) – In an interview with Al-Mayadeen, Kamal Kharazi, head of Iran’s Strategic Council on Foreign Relations and former foreign minister, openly suggested that if Iran faces serious threats, it may consider moving towards nuclear weapons development. Kharazi also warned of Europe’s hostile stances and hinted that Iran might increase the range […]
If the Islamic Republic of Iran lacks nuclear deterrence, there remains little doubt that Israel would not hesitate to pose an actual threat.
Furthermore, where Israel can annihilate millions of innocent lives with nuclear weapons without shedding a drop of Jewish blood, what other element besides the principle of dynamic jurisprudence could safeguard humanity and the Islamic Republic of Iran against nuclear domination?
User comments