WANA (August 17)On Friday, Israel’s Foreign Minister Israel Katz caused a stir with his aggressive rhetoric, suggesting that Israel expects international allies like Britain and France to not only defend against a potential Iranian attack but also join in striking significant Iranian targets. This bold claim has surprised many observers.

 

Katz’s comments came during a meeting in Jerusalem with British counterparts, where they discussed ways to “prevent regional tensions from escalating and promote a hostage deal.” However, France and Britain have downplayed the notion of joining an anti-Iran coalition. The UK emphasized the need to break the “current vicious cycle of retaliatory violence” in the Middle East.

 

French Foreign Minister Stéphane Séjourne criticized Katz’s talk of “retaliation or readiness for revenge” as “inappropriate” during ongoing diplomatic negotiations. Meanwhile, the U.S. has taken a more cautious stance, warning Iran of “catastrophic” consequences if it escalates tensions but avoiding commitment to direct intervention.

 

CNN reported that during the meeting between the Israeli, French, and British foreign ministers, there was no discussion about forming a coalition for an attack on Iran. The U.S. has urged Iran through intermediaries to avoid attacks, stressing that reducing tensions and seeking a ceasefire is crucial.

 

As tensions rise following the assassination of Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh, which Iran attributes to Israel, the international community remains cautious. The U.S. has bolstered its military presence in the region but has not committed to any specific actions against Iran, indicating a preference for diplomatic solutions.