What You Need to Know About Iran’s Response to Trump
WANA (Mar 29) – Iran’s response to Trump’s letter was a smart one. It used an official language of deterrence against Trump’s threats while also signaling readiness for logical negotiations.
In its message to the U.S., Iran issued a formal warning that any potential military action by the regime against the Islamic Republic would be met with reciprocal retaliation against American bases and interests in the region.
Iran made it clear that any negotiations regarding its missile and drone programs are impossible. Regarding regional activities, Iran referred to the independence of groups aligned with the Islamic Republic, meaning that the U.S. must engage directly with those parties.
However, on nuclear activities, Iran signaled openness to indirect negotiations as a way to test America’s sincerity in talks. Essentially, Iran stated that due to Washington’s deceptive approach—setting unreasonable conditions while pretending to negotiate—it has no interest in direct talks with the White House.
Iran also took an interesting approach in choosing its communication channel. While the initial message was delivered by the Emiratis, Iran sent its response through Oman—a country that has been a reliable intermediary over the years.
Why Oman Was Chosen for Iran’s Response to the U.S.
WANA (Mar 28) – Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi stated that most reports about the content of the U.S. letter are based on speculation and assumptions. “It is natural that certain diplomatic exchanges take place,” he said. He added: “The Americans sent a letter, which was thoroughly examined and discussed in Iran. Its dimensions were […]
