WANA (Apr 26) – Esmail Kowsari, a member of the Iranian Parliament’s National Security and Foreign Policy Committee, emphasized that any negotiations with the United States must be contingent upon clear and practical commitments from Washi ngton—specifically, the complete withdrawal of U.S. military forces from the region and a reduction in its unconditional support for the Zionist regime.

 

He added that for years, the U.S. military presence in the Middle East has threatened security and stability, and its full-scale backing of the occupying regime in Jerusalem has exacerbated the crisis in Palestine. “If Washington seeks dialogue with Iran, it must first change these destructive policies,” he stated.

 

Kowsari stressed that the Islamic Republic of Iran, with strength and prudence, has consistently defended the rights of regional nations, and any negotiation must serve the interests of the Iranian people and other independent countries.

 

In conclusion, he said: “We believe in principled negotiations based on mutual respect. However, past experience shows that the United States has not honored its commitments. Therefore, any dialogue must come with practical guarantees and international oversight.”

The third round of indirect talks between Iran and the United States will begin today at noon in Muscat, Oman, with Omani mediation playing a central role. Prior to the high-level negotiations, technical-level discussions are being held between the two sides to lay the groundwork for the main topics.

 

These confidential talks aim to reduce tensions and explore ways to return to a possible agreement, focusing primarily on nuclear issues, sanctions, and regional security.

 

Oman is playing a key role by relaying messages between the Iranian and American delegations, facilitating a secure and indirect communication channel. This method has been used in previous negotiations to create a less confrontational environment for dialogue.

 

Despite major differences over Iran’s nuclear program, sanctions, and missile activities, analysts believe that both Tehran and Washington are in a position where even a temporary agreement may be necessary. Iran’s economic challenges and internal political pressures in the U.S. could drive both sides toward compromise, though the path remains difficult and uncertain.